In this great design of things you get a B+ just for effort. Where you confused everybody was first in the specifics. You know, it is said, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn't be more accurate in this article. Having said that, let me inform you just what exactly did do the job. The article (parts of it) is incredibly persuasive and this is most likely the reason why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, despite the fact that I can notice a jumps in reasoning you make, I am definitely not certain of exactly how you seem to unite the details which produce your final result. For now I will, no doubt subscribe to your position but hope in the future you link the dots better.